Which brings us to the issue of the "this reminds me of" approach to social blog commenting. Like, the story of academician Ambartsumyan winning a Volga car in a state lottery reminds someone of the story of plumber Sarkisyan losing 100 rubles playing dominoes with his friends in the yard.
On the one hand, we read, in my blog entry: "Should they have some meaningful suggestions concerning improvement of my writings, we can talk about that. If they just aren't prepared to publish my writings, we have nothing to talk about."
On the other hand, the Physical Review did not reject Einstein's paper, this is just not true. Instead, we read, under your link: "Tate returned the manuscript to Einstein on 23 July with a critical review and the mild request that he “would be glad to have [Einstein’s] reaction to the various comments and criticisms the referee has made.” Einstein wrote back on 27 July in high dudgeon, withdrawing the paper and dismissing out of hand the referee’s comments".
no subject
On the one hand, we read, in my blog entry: "Should they have some meaningful suggestions concerning improvement of my writings, we can talk about that. If they just aren't prepared to publish my writings, we have nothing to talk about."
On the other hand, the Physical Review did not reject Einstein's paper, this is just not true. Instead, we read, under your link: "Tate returned the manuscript to Einstein on 23 July with a critical review and the mild request that he “would be glad to have [Einstein’s] reaction to the various comments and criticisms the referee has made.” Einstein wrote back on 27 July in high dudgeon, withdrawing the paper and dismissing out of hand the referee’s comments".